stockssuper.blogg.se

1. MOZILLA FIREFOX FOR MAC SNOW LEOPARD INSTALL
2. MOZILLA FIREFOX FOR MAC SNOW LEOPARD PC
3. MOZILLA FIREFOX FOR MAC SNOW LEOPARD WINDOWS 7

They might, ummm, they will surely miss some of the convenient “basic” feature such as “cut and paste” ! Working with Mac’s Finder, however, can be very tricky, especially for ex Windows users who changed to Mac.

MOZILLA FIREFOX FOR MAC SNOW LEOPARD INSTALL

It provides all the basic needs for most users and generally we don’t need to install or purchase additional software to help us in file management. Working with Windows Explorer was never a problem for me as I already used to it for many years.

Shutdown time also reasonably ok, slightly longer than Snow Leopard’s.įile Management : Windows Explorer vs Mac Finder Microsoft deserves two thumbs up from me for their good work this time.

MOZILLA FIREFOX FOR MAC SNOW LEOPARD WINDOWS 7

Windows 7 startup time is a lot faster than any other previous Windows. The shutdown time is almost instant, impressive ! My fully loaded system starts in less than a minute. Windows Vista is the worst in everything ! Forget it ! Its shutdown time is also slow, sometimes can be very irritating when we need to restart. Windows XP startup time is slow, yet somehow people learned to “accept” it after using it for years. New users would probably confused for a while about the location of close button (Windows on the right, OSX on the left), about the different function of Windows button vs Mac button, and about the concept of “closing a window” vs “closing an application” but other than those, switching from one system to another is not that hard. Windows 7 vs Snow Leopard : there is no absolute winner for this comparison it’s about taste, I guess. It is more stylish, simple and comfortable to use.

Windows XP vs Snow Leopard : OS X is the clear winner. To me, it sorta look similar to Snow Leopard’s dock concept. Windows 7 brings fresh ideas in their taskbar and menus, though I would argue that the idea is not entirely theirs. But as I believe most people simply want a computer that works, that they can use, then Mac would still be my choice.Īs desktop appearance in modern operating systems are generally customizable, both systems produces nice and elegant look using their own style. If you need greater flexibility in deciding what should be in your computer, then maybe a Mac is not for you.

MOZILLA FIREFOX FOR MAC SNOW LEOPARD PC

PC computers, though some manufacturers already release newer models with pretty looks (smaller CPU casing, integrated-with-monitor PC, etc) still the most popular model is the “old and classic” computer where CPU is located in an over-sized casing with a lot of heat fans that might sound noisy is used near midnight.Ĭustomizable is still one of the plus point of PC. From iMac to Mac Mini, from MacBook to MacBook Pro, they have products for different needs. It makes a computer “more human” and would fit as part of home decoration. To me, I love Mac that combines advanced technology with style.

Mac computers only produced by Apple and has limited number of options. PC has thousands of models from different manufacturers.

While this review might indicate that one system is better than the other (for some aspects), the original intention was to help new learners to understand the differences, as well as strengths and weaknesses of the two systems. This review will compare some of the basic features of Personal Computer running Windows XP and Windows 7 (I hate Windows Vista) with Mac computers running OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard.